Thursday, May 24, 2018

Sandy Hook: Not only is "Noah Pozner" a fiction, but his father, "Lenny", is also a fake


Mona Alexis Pressley with Dan Cromer
Conspiracy Realists

Is "Lenny Pozner" another name for Reubin Vabner?

Since "Noah Pozner" was a fiction made up out of photos of Michael 
Vabner, why should it come as a surprise that "Lenny Pozner" 
could also be Reubin Vabner, Michael's father?

Our research on the Sandy Hook school shooting continues despite the abuse Leonard Pozner dishes out to concerned Americans.  Pozner is the true picture of a traitor that has sold out his fellow man.  He is a banker/financial consultant and a NWO shill that seems to have no remorse lying and stealing everyone’s donations. Not to mention the trauma our people in the U.S. have endured since 9/11. Oh I know it’s nothing like the Zionists say they went through during their years in the wilderness. Especially, since they are so much better than us and why Leonard Pozner thinks this is all ok to do. 

Lenny's fake "death certificate" for his purported son, Noah Pozner

He states on his website that he has answered questions and shown everyone Noah’s documents. He is the perfect sociopath gas lighting everyone who will go along and be fooled by him. He even sent Kelley Watt a death certificate for Noah that turned out to be a fabrication: the bottom half of a real death certificate with the top half of a fake. It had no file number and the wrong estimated time of death. Obviously, if he had lost a son at Sandy Hook, he would have been able to produce a real one rather than a fake. And we have other good reasons to question the existence of Noah Pozner himself:


Kelley Watt noticed that "Noah" looked like a young Michael Vabner
Lenny shames people for asking questions about problems with the official narrative. He never shows up to court because showing his face would mean he would be found out (explanation later), and he has numerous websites and ongoing battles to take down any Sandy Hook questions about the official story. The man is relentless.  He seems to have no remorse and goes a step further by abusing those he has already abused. And we now have good reasons to believe that, not only was "Noah" a fiction created out of photos of Michael Vabner as a child, but that his father, "Lenny", is a fiction himself.



Who is "Lenny Pozner"?


Lenny Panzer’s real name appears to be Reuben Vabner, the father of Danielle and Michael Vabner. where "Noah" was Michael when he was a child in the 1990’s. Do not let the difference in Reuben and Lenny's ears fool you: they are still lopsided in the same direction even though the tops are bigger on Lenny, which we take to be one of the means they faked to deny they are the same. Photo forensics demonstrates to anyone interested that Lenny’s ears were extended at the tips. His chin was fattened up as well, which you can also see in photo forensics. Take away the ear tips and the double chin and you have Reuben Vabner. The Vabner photo must have been taken over 10 years ago, so we are confident some weight gain has occurred as well:

                     
As you can observe in this close up photograph of "Lenny", his teeth are crooked like Vabner's. The parts of the image--the ear, eye, and double chin--were photoshopped and deliberately made blurry:

Here is a list of Vabner’s job’s to demonstrate he NWO shill here to help bring down the U.S.

The photo below (left) is a better image of "Lenny's" real ears as a match for Reubin's (right):

They created a twin for Noah to throw everyone off and the older sister was Danielle. They photoshopped Lenny to appear older in the pics from the 90’s to make them look more recent. Reuben was born in 1955 making him older then Lenny which makes more sense. It was obvious Lenny looks and actually is a lot older than 50 years of age.

Faking "Noah's" Photographs


Many of Noah Pozner’s photos appear to have been created from those of Michael Vabner, his alleged older step-brother, when he was younger, while others may have been from Veronique’s brother, Alexis Haller, since they also look very much alike. When looking at some of the pics it looks as though there more than one boy was used. That could explain the problems Alexis Haller and Pozner had the year after the “shooting”. 


Jim Fetzer asked Larry Rivera to perform a superposition to test the hypothesis that they are indeed one and the same, which produced the following confirmation We have established far beyond a reasonable doubt that "Noah" and "Michael" are the same person, since this proof demonstrates that no alternative hypothesis is reasonable

     
During a discussion about the column by Mike Adams, "'The Most Dangerous Mind in America", someone calling himself dson30 asked, "Who is the boy in the Spiderman video?" with "Lenny". We had already established that "Noah" was Michael Vabner, where the interesting question is not the identity of the boy, which we already knew, but of the man with him, his father, whose real name is not "Lenny Pozner" but Reubin Vabner.

[Editor's note: By far the most interesting comments on the discussion thread for Mike Adams' article, "'The Most Dangerous Mind in America' interviewed about false flags and extreme censorship" (6 May 2018) were those from someone using the handle, "dson30", whom I believe to be Reubin Vabner (aka "Lenny Pozner"). He seems to know too much about both of the boys and to be too eager to dismiss their identification. Here's one of his most interesting comments:


When I suggest the fellow at the lower right is "Noah" all grown up, he remarks, "If the guy on the right is Michael Vabner, why does that matter?", which would be ridiculous but for his contention that we have not shown "Noah" to be a fiction created out of photos of Michael when younger. He also claims that our superpositions "only show they have similarities", which he says they should have since they are half-brothers who share the same mother. His question about "Spiderman", by the way, is rather telling.

By asking who is in the photo of a little boy with the one we have identified until now as "Lenny Pozner", he thinks he has made the following argument: Since the little boy is with his father, Lenny Pozner, it makes no sense to suppose he is actually Michael Vabner. But when you realize that "Lenny Pozner" is a pseudonym for Reubin Vabner, it makes perfect sense to suppose that he is with his father, because his father is actually Reubin Vabner, even though we have known him by another name. There are lots of details here that further confirm my inference that dson30 is Reubin Vabner (aka Lenny Pozner).]
               

Faking "Noah's" Gravestone


It appears that the engraving on the Noah Pozner headstone was digitally added. Note the perspective of the engraving on Noah's headstone compared to an actual headstone. Noah's engraving (top) appears to have been digitally "stamped" onto the headstone compared to authentic engraving (bottom):

Notice, too, that the spacing is improper. Engraving is a very deliberate form of art that even approximates a science since exact placement has a premium for monuments designed to endure for centuries. But this one for NOAH SAMUEL is too far to the left and not completely horizontal.
 
Here are some examples illustrating how effortless it can be to fake images like these. Alas, when "Lenny" faked these--as we presume he was the one--he didn't do a very good job. As in case after case of these staged shootings, it's the details that give the game away: totally fake! Jim Fetzer isn't even Jewish!
 

Has Wolfgang been Played?

 

[Editor's note: On the basis of the creation of "Noah Pozner" using photos of Michael Vabner when he was younger, I have generalized to the conclusion that the photos of the kids were all generated that way--but not considering that6, in some cases, the parents may have used photos of themselves as children for this purpose. What Mona initiates here is a new line of Sandy Hook research, where, as occurs in the history of science, we proceed by the method of successive approximation in arriving at the truth, where our findings are tentative and fallible.] 

Wolfgang Halbig has been given a picture of the children all grown up. Now granted some of the children’s pics were of the older siblings but a majority are of the parents. Therefore, the teenagers in this pic are of the older siblings used in this hoax and the others may just been look-alikes or the parents at this age photoshopped in. 


The style of clothing back when the parents were children was unique as is in most generations.  When looking at the pics initially they just did not seem right for that reason.  Look at the style of the clothes in the pictures and ask yourself if it fits the time of 2012. It is highly doubtful. The clothes look like the style from the 70’s and judging from the parents ages that is about right.

  
Take a look at Soto and what she is wearing. Look at her badly photoshopped cut off fingers. Also, which one is the real school picture and why did two class pictures appear? We have been forced to consider the alternative hypothesis that many of the parents used photographs of themselves when they were children to avoid implicating their own children in such an elaborate scam.


Parents faking their "children"


Take a look at Lynn McDonnell with her “daughter” and the dress she is wearing. It is a style that was popular in the 70’s.  Her daughter has the same shaped face that McDonnell does and exact body frame. Children usually look like a combination of both parents but none of these children do. They look like one parent with the exception of the few times older siblings were used to create the victims at the school shooting. Another observation, Grace McDonnell appears much older than 6 in the picture on the right.


Next are the Parkers. Same as with the McDonnell’s Emilie was created out of Alyssa’s childhood pics. Also, a few days after the massacre I found the Parker's website. I explored the back page info and discovered the page had been changed a couple of days after the “shooting”. What had been changed on the website was the title, From Parker Four to Parker Family.
   
Alyssa and Alyssa Jr. picked up the habit of wrinkling their nose that never stopped in adulthood. Keep in the mind the clothing when looking at all these pictures.


Next, we have Mark Mattioli and his son, James. Again the style of clothes is from the 70’s and the ears are an identical match.

    
Jessica Rekos again looks exactly like Mom, and has on clothes from the 70’s in variety of pics. The parts in their hair are almost identical.
    

[Editor's note: A video that appears to show James Mattioli attending his own funeral seems to have been taken down by YouTube. (No surprise there!) Of course, it would mean that Mona and Dan don't have everything right about how they faked the kids, but provides as devastating a proof that Sandy Hook was an elaborate charade as one could possibly desire. We do have a video covering the funerals for both James and Jessica, which shows that funerals can be as easily faked as headstones.]

 

Faking the Administration


Even the teacher’s clothes were old fashioned for 2012.  Dawn Hochsprung did not exist in that school district. In fact she did not exist in any official records except the ones created for this drill. After close examination it appears Dawn Hochsprung is Mary Sherlock when she was young. The actual Principal in 2010 in the pics below was Barbara Gasperine. Both pics are incorrect since the school was closed but having two school Principals shows foul play.


   


Victoria Soto and Rachel Davino.  This is the same woman at a different age. Judging from the style of clothing they are both Soto’s mom when she was younger at two different ages. Funny, they changed the color of the dog to try to make her look like a different person. Mom still likes the green scarf.
 

[Editor's note: This case is also fascinating because the same woman who played Victoria Soto's mother in Sandy Hook also played Heather Heyer's mother in Charlottesville:

For more, see "FAKE NEWS: The New York Times celebrates a Charlottesville Stunt Man, a Shopped Photo and a Crisis Actor (who made her debut in Sandy Hook".]

  
The Lafferty gun grabber complaining in a tweet how she will never have her mother at her wedding while posting a picture of “her mother and sister” although the picture comes from a wedding picture of Sharon Epple (school administrator and Principal at Newtown Middle School) at her daughter’s wedding.

   

The last person in this blog is Anne Marie Murphy, (even though there are others in the Sandy Hook drill that needs further investigation) who was born on July 25, 1960.  The one Anne Marie Murphy who died at 52 years old is alive and now 57 years old teaching in MA.  Same birthday and same last name even though now she added the last name O’Reilly. Probably why they only printed blurred adult photos.

   

The family that stated she was their daughter does not match any documentation found on Ancerstory.com or other websites researched. After extensive research there was never any mention of a daughter Anne Marie Murphy in that family or birth records.


Concluding Reflections


Ask yourself if your loved one had just gotten violently killed would you be smiling like these people? 

 
Would you be smiling like these Sandy Hook parents had you just lost your child?

So, as with all government drills since Obama repealed the Smith-Mundt act of 1948, the people have become their own worst enemy. Americans have become a society of PARROTS that listen to a sociopathic government wanting to take every last ounce of our freedom away! If you think this is just a conspiracy theory then look around. Seriously, start listening to what your eyes see, and what your gut tells you? Everything the mainstream media reports, or someone with a big mouth says, is repeated by those that do no research. Most of the public has been spending their lives sleepwalking through history.

As a result, the people who are trying to expose the theft, fraud and continued trauma the American people suffer are being treated like the criminals, while the criminals are walking free and laughing all the way to the bank. The difficult work that Wolfgang Halbig, James Tracy, Dr. James Fetzer and many others have been doing for ungrateful Americans is unbelievable. One day, hopefully soon, Americans will turn off the TV, educate themselves, put their egos on the shelf, thank the selfless researchers for what they have done, and begin to help to resolve our nation's problems.

Mona Alexis Pressley has done brilliant work on Las Vegas and on Parkland, including tracking down the decedents on whom the obituaries in Las Vegas were based, who died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death. Her research has been having a significant impact on understanding these "false flag" events, now also including Sandy Hook.

Dan Cromer has a background in IT, including expertise with both audio and video technology, which enabled him to confirm that the sound track from Las Vegas was too good to have been recorded at the scene but had to have been prerecorded, which was crucial in figuring out that Las Vegas was a movie! His primary contribution here was to the photographic record.


Wednesday, May 23, 2018

FACT CHECKERS GET IT WRONG: "March for Our Lives" permit WAS issued months in advance





No, the March For Our Lives demonstration was not prepared several months in advance of its date


Attendants of the 'March For Our Lives' demonstration hold signs on March 24, 2018 in Washington D.C. (Associated Press)
An Internet hoax has spread suggesting that the student-led demonstration March for Our Lives was planned months in advance to the actual event.
"Application for ‘March for Our Lives’ permit was made months before Parkland school shooting," read the headline on Fellowship of the Minds, a website that pushes conspiracy theories and religious ideas.
The mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School happened on Feb. 14. Since then, student survivors have made multiple media appearances and organized events promoting increased gun control. The national demonstration March For Our Lives occurred on March 24 in Washington.
The Mayor's Special Events Task Force requires a Letter of Intent at least 6 months in advance.

An application for a permit organized by Los Angeles-based television producer and co-executive director of the Women’s March Los Angeles Foundation, Deena Katz, was submitted on Feb. 20.
The article cites a correspondence with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Scott C. Earhardt as to why the march may have been planned in advance. After an apparent source of Light on Conspiracies author Ole Dammegard contacted the police department regarding the permit, they received a response from Earhardt with the following message:
"In reference to your inquiry concerning the March for Our Lives Demonstration, here in the District of Columbia on March 24, 2018. MPD received a permit application several months prior to the actual event, and there was several months of planning for this large event."
However, when we contacted Officer Scott C. Earhardt, he said that he had mistakenly mixed up the annual D.C.-based March for Life rally that happened in January with the more recent March for Our Lives demonstration in the email.
How could there be any confusion when he cites the name of the march and its date?

Earhardt told PolitiFact that the story is not factual and that the permit for March for Our Lives was issued on March 13.
The misunderstanding between the two parties is likely to have increased confusion about the actual dates of when the permit was issued.
The screenshot of the email pictured in the article was credited to James Fetzer, a philosophy of science professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth who has promoted various conspiracy theories, including denying the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting, the Boston Marathon bombing and the Holocaust.
March for Our Lives was organized by the Parkland student survivors who began the Never Again movement to promote gun control. They partnered with the nonprofit organization Everytown for Gun Safety, founded by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
Even TIME was laying it out by 18 March, not enough time to organize a local bake sale.

Our ruling
A website pushing conspiracy theories claimed that the March For Our Lives permit was actually prepared months in advance.
We contacted the police officer referred to in the story who confirmed that the story is inaccurate and the permit was actually issued 11 days prior to the march.
We rate this story Pants on Fire.






UPDATE: For more on this crucial issue, see the following for substantiation:


"Officer Scott Earhardt and The Great 'March for Our Lives' Permit Boondoggle"


Officer Earhart has now offered FOUR DIFFERENT DATES for the permit having been issued.


Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota and co-editor of moonrockbooks.com.

School shootings have decreased since the 90’s but Democrats would like you to believe the opposite



(INTELLIHUB) — In an early 2018 pieceMises Wire editor Ryan McMaken pointedly articulates the fact that official U.S. government documents indicate a decline nationally in homicides and school shooting since the 90’s which means that schools are actually far safer today than they were over two decades ago. However, Democrats and certain left-leaning media shills would like to you believe quite the opposite, mostly because it suits their gun control agenda.
“And when it comes to things like homicides, there is no evidence that things are getting worse,” the publication’s editor made clear in his piece. “There were far morehomicides in the United States during the 1980s and 1990s than there are today.”
“Things were even worse than that during the 1970s,” he wrote. “In fact, the homicide rate in the US was cut in half between 1991 and 2014.”
FiveThirtyEight
Additionally, his piece linked to a Northern University report titled Schools are safer than they were in the 90s, and school shootings are not more common than they used to be, researchers say which paints a different picture then the one the media and top-level Dems have fed to the general public over the years following the tragic Columbine High School massacre (1999) in which attackers Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold terrorized and killed students and teachers using guns and explosives in Jefferson County, Colorado.
I have to say, after reading his work, I like the way McMaken thinks. 
So here is where I’m going with this. The American people have been lied to by payola politicians and media proprietors who have no vested interest in this country or the people in it.

The data

Take a look at these statistics from Northern University:
Since 1996, there have been 16 multiple victim shootings in schools, or incidents involving 4 or more victims and at least 2 deaths by firearms, excluding the assailant.
Of these, 8 are mass shootings, or incidents involving 4 or more deaths, excluding the assailant.

Although most school shootings end in homicide, the number of homicides from school shootings is far less today than it was decades ago.

“Four times the number of children were killed in schools in the 1990’s than today.”

Withal, a report by the US Department of Justice (Office of Justice Programs) titled School Safety: By the Numbers concludes school crime rates have, in fact, decreased and not increased over time.
READ NOW:
Shooting now ‘contained’ at Santa Fe High School near Houston; injuries confirmed
Take a look at the numbers yourself.
DOJ

The report also shows just how rare school shootings really are.

DOJ

School violence is nothing new, it has just gained more media attention in recent years and the attention of high-level Democrats with a politically charged agenda.

DOJ

Traumatic events at school may happen more often than not.

DOJ

Seven percent of students are cyber-bullied, according to the report.

DOJ
You can read the full July 2017 National Institute of Justice Report here.

How far will the puppet masters go to change the general public’s view and their capability of freethinking? (Please share this poll, RT)

Featured Image: Mesa Tactical/Flickr
©2018. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Shepard Ambellas is an opinion journalist, analyst, and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub News & Politics (Intellihub.com). Shepard is also known for producing Shade: The Motion Picture (2013) and appearing on Travel Channel’s America Declassified (2013). Shepard is a regular contributor to Infowars. Read more from Shep’s World. Follow Shep on Facebook. Subscribe to Shep’s YouTube channel.