“By their fruits, you will know them.” -Matthew 7:16
Those who know and live the truth are serene and confident and do not lower themselves by being nasty, vicious and evil — no matter the critics, skeptics and detractors.
So it’s noteworthy that this is how Sandy Hookers — those who claim that a shooting massacre of 20 school children and 6 adults took place 3 years ago at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut — behave toward skeptics:
Stalk and threaten Wolfgang Halbig and his family, so that the former state trooper has discontinued his investigation.
Pressured Amazon.com to ban the book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, despite nearly a month of brisk sales. (To download a free copy of the book,click here.)
Effect the media’s self-censorship via a nationwide blackout about the very newsworthy book ban by Amazon.com.
Succeed in Goal #4, resulting in Tracy being served “a letter of dismissal”from his university. So much for tenure and academic freedom.
Not content with getting Tracy fired, the Sandy Hookers are now resorting to threats, dirty tricks and harassment.
On December 17, 2015, Tracy received the following threatening email:
From: Ronald Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:12 AM
To: James Tracy
Subject: Tenure won’t matter
We’re comin’ for you…the law can’t save you.
You’ll beg for ‘lights out’ as your Christmas wish, but the agony will last interminably.
Or you can publicly make amends and never enter academia. Filth like yourself charged with teaching our kids is tantamount to injecting an autoimmune virus into society.
End it now. Consider yourself warned. We are everywhere…we are legion.
On the morning of December 21, 2015, someone hacked into Tracy’s university email account and sent an email in his name, saying that he is “delusional,” to a federal government agency — the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), which is a part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which itself is an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). NIMH conducts and supports research on the brain and disorders of mental health.
Below is the fraudulent email:
From: Jftracy@fau.edu Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 1:39 AM To: email@example.com Subject: Request Assistance/Information
I’m delusional and need help
Two days later on December 23, 2015, at 11:52 AM, NIMH’s Information Resource Center replied to the fraudulent email, stating that they “are sorry to hear that you are experiencing delusions and understand your need for assistance.” Information on “Finding Treatment” was provided and the email was signed off as:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health
The next day, on Christmas Eve, Tracy received an obscene postcardvia USPS with a silhouette of a defecating dog, and the name of Tracy’s wife and their home phone number handwritten on the card. The back of the card has a F-you message. To add injury upon insult, the post card was not stamped and was delivered “postage due”.
Below is the post card (front and back). I’ve blacked out Mrs. Tracy’s name, their home address and phone number to protect their privacy.
According to Wikipedia, Cornhill is a community in the center of the city of Utica, New York. Posters to City Dictionary describe Cornhill as:
“Utica’s most dangerous area to live in. There is a lot of violence, drugs and murders.”
“Very black, and very dangerous area. If you stand at the border of the Cornhill section you can hear the ‘click’ of people hitting their car door locks as they drive in.”
“cornhill isn’t safe for everyone. being scared of a drive-by or cops breaking down your door can make a person really paranoid.”
“Cornhill is a GHETTO.”
The 13501 zip code is within Utica, NY:
Tracy will file police reports on both the email hack and the obscene post card.
NOTE: When the Pozners took donations from the public, they lost their right to privacy, because it is in the public interest to avoid being taken for a ride by con men, shysters and frauds.
James Tracy was probing the legitimacy of their claim to have lost a son, which was a very good question because:
(1) Lenny had given a fabricated death certificate to Kelley Watt (which you can find in the book in Ch. 11); and,
(2) Noah was reported to have died for the second time in Pakistan (on or about 16 December 2014, two years after 14 December 2012).
We have proven that the school was actually closed by 2008 in NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), which was BANNED BY AMAZON.COM because it blew apart the Obama "gun control" motive derived from faking the shooting.
Sun Sentinel Editors and Staff,
Does no one at the Sun Sentinel care about truth? Faculty never speak for their institutions; that is the role of the administration. Since Tracy is faculty, not administration, he cannot possibly be speaking for FAU. They know that.
Noah Pozner is an unusual young man, who reportedly has died twice: once at Sandy Hook (on 14 December 2012) and again in Pakistan (on 16 December 2014). You might want to ask Lenny Pozner how that could have happened.
Like the other families of Sandy Hook, the Pozners have pocketed over $1,000,000 due to donations from the public which has been taken in by the official account. If the hoax were to become public, they might have to give it back.
The book has 13 contributors, including 6 Ph.D. (current or retired) college professors and other experts on the case. I am copying some of them here. It has been released to the public for free after having been banned by amazon.com.
We have a mountain of proof that the school was closed by 2008, which means there were no students there and thus none for Adam Lanza (who appears to be a creature of fiction) to have shot and none to evacuate.
It was a two-day drill, with the rehearsal on the 13th, going LIVE on the 14th. Some participants did not understand and put up donation sites on the 13th. Even Adam Lanza was originally reported to have died the day before.
We even have the FEMA manual, which I included in the book as Appendix A. We have presented the thorough and detailed results of our investigation, which anyone can now download from rense.com, for example, and read for free.
We have 50 photos of furnishing the Lanza home to serve as a prop and 50 more of them refurbishing the school to serve as the stage. One shows the SWAT team in place. The windows to Classroom 10 (seen over the vehicle) are undamaged.
That means this photo was taken before the shooting. Crime scene tape is up for a crime that has yet to be committed. And Wayne Carver, Medical Examiner, is awaiting the arrival of his portable mortuary tent. It was an elaborately staged event.
Here are the windows of Classroom 10 before and after "the shooting" as well as photos of the perps drilling the holes in the window frame and the pink rods showing the presumptive trajectories, which would never occur with a real event:
Here is a photo of the Nancy Lanza bedroom suite. Adam is supposed to have shot her four times in the head, but that is not real blood. And in their haste to finish arranging the room, they left a blue moving pad under the leg of the bed:
I am a former Marine Corps officer who spent 35 years offering course in logic critical thinking and scientific reasoning. Tracy is the only one on the FAU campus who has taken the time to study the case. No one else has done it.
He may be the most outstanding member of the faculty but is being railroaded by those who believe everything they hear from the mass media. I would like to think that you might be an exception. This is a gross miscarriage of justice.
Fraud. An intentional perversion of truth for the purpose of inducing another in reliance upon it to part with some valuable thing belonging to him or to surrender a legal right; Anything calculated to deceive, whether by a single act or combination, or by suppression of truth, or suggestion of what is false, whether it be by direct falsehood or innuendo, by speech or silence, word of mouth, or look or gesture.-Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition
Three years ago the public learned of the most significant mass shooting in recent US history involving the deaths of 20 young school children and seven adults. As a father of three I immediately empathized with the parents, reminding myself there was no real way to fathom the sense of loss such an experience must involve.
After several days of reflection, however, my instincts as a media analyst took charge. In reviewing news coverage of the Sandy Hook School massacre I began to recognize very unusual features in the alleged forensics, the emergency response and the overall way the event was being reported.
Commonplace emergency protocols were abandoned. There was no surge of EMTs into the building, no proper triage protocol employed or Med-Evac helicopters called. Parents were not even allowed to view and hold the bodies of their deceased children, and law enforcementoddly admonished those who questioned the official narrative online were subject to criminal prosecution.
When I chose to publicly share my analyses and suggest that the event was being inaccurately reported and seized upon by politicians to implement long-sought agendas I was attacked and labelled a “conspiracy theorist.”
This media frenzy (here and here) developed into a campaign to embarrass my university employer into firing me. My continued research on this topic has developed into a scholarly project that the institution of tenure was intended to protect. But how could one ever dare propose such subject matter?
Beginning in the 1960s women and racial minorities who secured a toehold in the academy used their tenure to address controversial topics that drew fire from conservative administrators and trustees. Unfortunately this tradition of radical inquiry has evolved into a stultifying, almost Victorian ethos of political correctness that often precludes honest exchange, sees oppression where none exists, and makes tenure a charade. It also renders profane the idea of questioning the motives of America’s first black president and attorney general.
In the December 10, 2015 online edition of the South Florida Sun-Sentinel Leonid “Lenny” and Veronique Pozner mounted a vicious attack that sought to intimidate my employer into removing my tenure and depriving me of my livelihood because of the questions I’ve raised concerning the Sandy Hook event and confirmation of Mr. Pozner’s unusually tenacious and profuse copyright claims.
Normally an endeavor targeting an individual’s primary asset would take shape as a lawsuit where proper discovery and judicial procedures might be adhered to. The recent 425-page volume of research on the Sandy Hook eventcompiled by six professors (including myself) would constitute for the Pozners a tremendous burden of going forward. They have thus once again chosen the low road of playing upon the prejudices of decent, good-hearted yet often poorly-informed Americans.
Along these lines, in June 2014 I sent CNN’s Anderson Cooper, who similarly attacked me on national television for questioning the state-sanctioned Sandy Hook narrative, anopen letter to join me in a trip to Newtown so that we could together reexamine the facts underlying the horrific tragedy he played a major part in covering. I emphasized that such a scoop could be tantamount to the next Watergate, and if he could satisfactorily put to rest my skepticism I would seriously consider resigning my academic post.
To this day my request has gone unanswered. Perhaps like me, Mr. Cooper knows that Newtown and Connecticut officials have failed to fulfill a multitude of public records requests which would readily confirm the nightmare Cooper and his media colleagues related as fact three years ago.
In a geographically vast country where imagery and emotion reign supreme, where fact is often replaced by unsubstantiated claims and hearsay, the eventual result will likely involve mass fraud leading to a severe loss of our freedoms, perhaps eventual tyranny, as de Tocqueville suggested following his tour of America almost two centuries ago.
Today more than ever citizens would be well served to recognize that much of what they are left to witness via mass media requires serious interrogation, possible only through a consistent regimen of intellectual self defense. This makes good reporters and worthwhile journalism. If that is an outmoded ideal and a skill that can no longer be practiced or taught to young adults I stand guilty as charged.
Noah Pozner is a very special boy because he has the distinction of dying twice — first at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on December 14, 2012; then thousands of miles across the world at thePeshawar Army School shootingin Pakistan 2 years later on December 16, 2014.
Now, on the 3rd anniversary of Noah’s first death, his parents Leonard (Lenny) and Veronique have penned an article attacking not just all Sandy Hook skeptics, but James Tracy in particular.
Tracy is a tenured Associate Professor of Communication and Multimedia Studies at Florida Atlantic University (FAU) and the owner of Memory Hole Blog.
When in 2013 Tracy first expressed his skepticismabout the official narrative on Sandy Hook, he put his career, professional reputation, as well as the safety of himself and his family in jeopardy:
CNN’s Anderson Cooperattacked Tracy and endangered his safety by publicly disclosing Tracy’s home address.
I was also told by Professor James Fetzer that someone slashed the tires of Tracy’s car.
Nor is Tracy’s tenure any protection becauseFAU is seeking to abolish tenure. As as you will read in the Pozners’ op/ed, Lenny and Veronique are aimed at precisely that — the firing of James Tracy from his tenured professorship on the grounds that his skepticism about Sandy Hook and other false flags harm the university’s reputation.
In this piece we want to focus on someone who is chief among the conspiracy theorists — Florida Atlantic University Professor James Tracy….
Although FAU issued a “reprimand” to Tracy for the irresponsible and insensitive comments he made in late 2012, he has shown no remorse and continues to conceive conspiracy theories out of each new mass shooting….
It is time FAU reassess if their priorities properly reflect the best interests of their staff, donors and — most importantly — their students. “The First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, but the Constitution does not guarantee that you can’t be fired for expressing your beliefs as part of your job,” says the National Education Association. “The courts could decide either way and the burden of proof shifts sharply to the professor.”
How you can help.
Please help Professor James Tracy by:
Write a comment in support of Tracyand all Sandy Hook skeptics on the Pozner’s article on the (Florida)Sun-Sentinel‘s website.Go here.
Call or write the president of Florida Atlantic University, Dr. John Kelly, reminding him that a university’s purpose is the pursuit and imparting of knowledge, and that the purpose of tenure is precisely to protect faculty like James Tracy from the shifting winds of political correctness and popular opinion. Here is FAU President John Kelly contact info.:
For all the postsFOTMhas published on Sandy Hook,go here.
After offering it for sale for about a month, Amazon.com bannedNobody Died at Sandy Hook— a book co-edited by Professor James Fetzer, with contributors who include Professor James Tracy, Dr. Eowyn, and other professionals. In order that Americans know the truth about Sandy Hook, the book is now available for free to anyone to read.To read/download the book in PDF format, click here:NobodyDiedAtSandyHook.
If you want a hard copy (sure to be a collector’s item!), Fetzer found an alternative printer/distributor forNobody Died at Sandy Hook— Moon Rock Books.Click here. Check it out and let others know. The pdf will remain available to the public for free.